State v. Coleman’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2015
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Quimby · 408 So. 2d 861 - State v. Talbot · 597 So. 2d 990 - State v. Hammons · 555 So. 2d 1335 - State v. Knapper · 701 So. 2d 949 - State v. Cavalier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The motion for a new trial is based on the supposition that injustice has been done the defendant, and, unless such is shown to have been the case the motion shall be denied, no matter upon what allegations it is grounded. The court, on motion of the defendant, shall grant a new trial whenever: [[Image here]] (3) New and material evidence that, notwithstanding the exercise of reasonable diligence by the defendant, was not discovered before or during the trial, is available, and if the evidence had been introduced at the trial it would probably have changed the verdict or judgment of guilty.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Vallier · State v. Brooks
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.