Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 959 SW2D 203 - Anson v. State

Anson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
December 2005
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In re Vey · 116 S. Ct. 712 - Neben & Starrett, Inc. v. Chartwell Financial Corp. · Rousseau v. State · Gardner v. Texas · Green v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Constitutional error. If the appellate record in a criminal case reveals constitutional error that is subject to harmless error review, the court of appeals must reverse a judgment of conviction or punishment unless the court determines beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to the conviction or punishment. (b) Other errors. Any other error, defect, irregularity, or variance that does not affect substantial rights must be disregarded.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “only if (1) he exhausts all of his peremptory challenges, (2) he requests more challenges, (3) his request is denied, and (4) he identifies an objectionable person seated on the jury on whom he would have exercised a peremptory challenge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.