Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 959 SW2D 284 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2018

9 state decisions

60199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Batson v. Kentucky · Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Burks v. United States · Hernandez v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Potential jurors may possess the same objectionable characteristics, but in varying degrees. Additionally, prospective jurors may share a negative feature, but that feature may be- outweighed' by characteristics that are favorable-from the State’s perspective. Such distinctions may not another.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.