State v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably State v. Middleton (1999), State v. Nash (2011)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Faretta v. California · Ornelas v. United States · Chambers v. Maroney · Bounds v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[P]robable cause to search ... exist[s] where the known facts and circumstances are sufficient to warrant a man of reasonable prudence in the belief that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Donovan“the factual and practical considerations of everyday life on which reasonable and prudent men, not legal technicians, act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Donovan“Searches of automobiles, because they are mobile, are generally excepted from the warrant requirement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Donovan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.