Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 959 SW2D 621 - Collier v. State

Collier v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
1
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently January 2016 · most notably Salazar v. State (2001), Feldman v. State (2002)

2 federal appellate · 43 state decisions

350199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · Ake v. Oklahoma · Estelle v. Smith · Godinez v. Moran · Simmons v. South Carolina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. Evidence sufficient to prompt a competency hearing or inquiry must raise a ‘‘bona fide doubt” in the mind of the trial judge as to the defendant's competency to stand trial; a bona fide, doubt exists if the evidence indicates recent severe mental illness, or at least moderate mental retardation, or truly bizarre acts by the defendant. ‘”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If during the trial evidence of the defendant’s incompetency is brought to the attention of the court from any source, the court must conduct a hearing out of the presence of the jury to determine whether or not there is evidence to support a finding of incompetency.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The issue of the defendant’s incompetency to stand trial shall be determined in ad- vanee of the trial on the merits if the court determines there is evidence to support a finding of incompetency to stand trial on its own motion or on written motion by the defendant or his counsel filed prior to the date set for trial on the merits asserting that the defendant is incompetent to stand trial, (emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.