Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 959 SW2D 908 - Spradling v. Spradling

Spradling v. Spradling’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2014

10 state decisions

60199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Murphy v. Carron · Tbg v. Cag · Herbert v. Harl · Holmes v. Holmes · Marriage of Price v. Price

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For income from rent, royalties, self-employment, proprietorship or a business or joint ownership or a partnership or closely held corporation, “gross income” is defined as gross receipts minus ordinary and necessary expenses required to produce income.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “determining the amount of child support to be paid, the application of Rule 88.01 and Form 14 is mandatory.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.