¶1— Order unanimously reversed, with costs, motion denied and petitioner’s petition reinstated. Memorandum: Family Court erred in vacating its prior approval of an agreement in which respondent admitted paternity and agreed to pay child support. Since petitioner and her child resided in Fargo, North Dakota, at the time the approval was requested, the notice requirement of subdivision (b) of section 516 of the Family Court Act has no extraterritorial effect (see McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes, § 149). (Appeal from order of Monroe County Family Court, Corbett, J. — paternity agreement.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ.
96 A.D.2d 743
Meyer v. Humaydan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 11, 1983
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1983-07-11
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 1989
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1983-07-11
View the full empirical analysis of this case →