Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

96 Ala. 554

Gainer & Co. v. Pollock & Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1893

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1893-11-15

Tried before the Hon. J. M. CaRmichael. This was an action by J. Pollock & Co., a partnership composed of Jacob Pollock and Leopold Lowenstein, against W. H. Gainer & Bro., a partnership composed of W. H. Gainer and James Gainer. The complaint contained only the common counts, on an account, on an account stated, and for goods, wares and merchandise sold by the plaintiffs to the defendants at their request.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1893-11-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1947

3 state decisions

10189319001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

WALIvEB, J.

¶1It is only by force of the statute that, in suits upon accounts, an ex parte itemized statement of the account, not proved in one of the ordinary modes of proof, but only verified by affidavit, is made legal evidence, under certain conditions fixed by the statute. The statute prescribes as a condition to the competency of such evidence that the plaintiff', at the time of bringing his suit, indorse on the summons and complaint, or other original process, the fact that the account is verified by affidavit. — Code, § 2773. No such indorsement was made in the present case. The objection on this ground to the admission in evidence of the account offered by the plaintiffs should have been sustained.

¶2Beversed and remanded.

/96/ala/554 · .json · Public domain