Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 ARK 354 - Taylor v. Gumpert

Taylor v. Gumpert’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
October 1983
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 1983

3 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

6019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miller v. State · Murray v. Galbraith · Murray v. Galbraith · France v. Shockey · Clampett v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where the slanderous words are actionable per se, the plaintiff is entitled as a matter of law to compensatory damages, and is not required to introduce evidence of actual damages to entitle him to recover substantial damages. In such a case the plaintiff need not prove actual damages in order to recover substantial damages.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.