Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 B.R. 326 - In Re Johnson

In Re Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
August 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2015

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

701989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 524

Relies on In the Matter of John Joseph METZ, Debtor. DOWNEY SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. John Joseph METZ, Appellee · Branding Iron Motel, Inc. v. Sandlian Equity, Inc. · Rowe International, Inc. v. Herd · Chandler Bank v. Ray · In Re Binford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that can be scheduled in a Chapter 13 plan. In reaching this conclusion we rely in part on the explanation of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary that Sec. 102(2)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he in rem liability of the property held as security remains unaffected and unenforceable by the mortgagee after discharge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “not accompanied by any obligation, note, debt, or right to payment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.