Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 CAL 243 - Lorenz v. Waldron

Lorenz v. Waldron’s Empirical Analysis

1892

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
July 1953
most recently cited

4 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 1953

4 district · 12 state decisions

501892190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Genet v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co. · Clark v. Willett · McMenomy v. Baud · Sherman v. Clark · Hall v. Rood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A mere possibility, or anything short of a reasonable probability, of injury, is insufficient to warrant an injunction against any proposed use of property by its owner. ‘Injury, material and actual, not fanciful or theoretical, or merely possible, must be shown as the necessary or probable result of the action sought to be restrained.’ * * * ‘The court cannot grant an injunction to allay the fears and apprehensions of individuals; they must show the court that the acts against which they ask protection are not only threatened, but will, in probability, be committed, to their injury.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.