Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 Cal. App. 632 - People v. Strider

96 Cal. App. 632 - People v. Strider’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 1954
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 1954

7 state decisions

301929193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Smith · 77 Cal. App. 738 - People v. Rodway

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “From something that is said in one of the briefs we infer that appellant entertains the view that a complete proof of the corpus delicti contemplates a showing that he committed the crime. If this is appellant's view he is in error in holding it. `To establish the corpus delicti it is not essential to show that the crime charged was committed by the defendant'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.