Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 CALAPP2D 709 - Danz v. Danz

Danz v. Danz’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 2005
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2005

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

40195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Parker v. Parker · Cohen v. Cohen · 21 Cal. 2d 354 - Butcher v. Brouwer · Di Corpo v. Di Corpo · Saunders v. Simms

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There can be no question that defendant remained obligated to support his daughter, but nobody obtained a modification of the judgment * * *. * * * To determine what portions of the entire amount during the later years after the remarriage of plaintiff should be allowed for the support of * * * [the child] * * * would be to indulge in speculation and guess * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.