Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 CALAPP2D 827 - People v. Daener

People v. Daener’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
3
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently May 2009 · most notably People v. Buffum (1953), 8 Cal. 3d 379 - People v. Cannady (1972)

44 state decisions

300195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Newland · People v. Yeager · People v. Montgomery · 77 Cal. App. 2d 350 - People v. Benenato · 42 Cal. App. 2d 270 - People v. Pianezzi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In any criminal trial or proceeding where evidence of flight of a defendant is relied upon as tending to show guilt, the court shall instruct the jury substantially as follows: “The flight of a person immediately after the commission of a crime, or after he is accused of a crime that has been committed, is not sufficient in itself to establish his guilt, but is a fact which, if proved, the jury may consider in deciding his guilt or innocence. The weight to which such circumstance is entitled is a matter for the jury to determine. “No further instruction on the subject of flight need be given.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “assumed neither the guilt nor flight of the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.