Gendelman v. Mongillo’s Empirical Analysis
1921
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 53 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently September 2007 · most notably DeLuca v. C. W. Blakeslee & Sons, Inc. (1978), Lynch v. Davis (1980)
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 53 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hurley v. Brown · Mead v. Parker · Nichols v. Johnson · Hodges v. Kowing · Kilday v. Schancupp
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The premises referred to were in each of these instances sufficiently definite to identify the land by its own terms, or by reference to external standards in existence at the time of the making of the memorandum.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gerardo v. Page“But parol evidence of the situation and circumstances of the land or other subject-matter about which the contract treats, is admissible to explain and give effect to the terms of the contract.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Philo Baldwin's right in Donald Baldwin's estate”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gerardo v. Page
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.