In re Brundage’s Empirical Analysis
96 F. 963 · 1899
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Minnesota v. Barber · Plumley v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Schollenberger v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Paul · Collins v. State of New Hampshire · United States v. Freel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No person, firm or corporate body shall manufacture out of any oleaginous substance, or any compound of the same other ihan that produced from unadulterated milk or of cream from the same, any article designed to take the place of butter or cheese produced from pure unadulterated milk or cream from the same, or of any imitation or adulterated butter or cheese, nor shall sell or offer for sale or have in his, her or their possession with intent to sell the same as an article of food.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Scheitlin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.