Grace Co. v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
96 F.2d 478 · 1938
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 1994
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 113 (Norris-LaGuardia Act)
Relies on Lauf v. E. G. Shinner & Co. · New Negro Alliance v. Sanitary Grocery Co. · United Electric Coal Companies v. Rice · 20 F. Supp. 263 - Grace Co. v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(9) The term ‘labor dispute’ includes any controversy concerning terms, tenure or conditions of employment, or concerning the association or representation of persons in negotiating, fixing, maintaining, changing, or seeking to arrange terms or conditions of employment, regardless of whether the disputants stand in the proximate relation of employer and employee.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Curtis v. Tozer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.