Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 F.2d 582 - Webb v. Lohnes

Webb v. Lohnes’s Empirical Analysis

96 F.2d 582 · 1938

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
July 1976
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently July 1976

8 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

5019381940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re the Probate of the Will of Davis · Avery, Appeal From Probate · Everding v. Hutchinson · Helfrich v. Yockel · Cairns v. Donahey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the ousted administrator should be allowed to appeal in order to support what he believes to be the genuine intestacy of the deceased, which is, in an extended sense, equally his will. If the executor is the `champion of the will,' the administrator is the champion of the intestacy. If `public policy * * * requires that a legally executed will be probated,' it requires that a spurious will be not probated. It is true that the decedent, being dead, has no interests to protect; but the persons who will receive the property if intestacy is established have interests. * * * Unless the administrator is permitted to oppose and to appeal from the probate of an alleged will, interests which are theoretically recognized may be unprotected in fact. The present case illustrates this danger. No heirs have been discovered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.