Bogy v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
96 F.2d 734 · 1938
Citation profile
66 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently August 2002 · most notably Weiss v. United States (1941), United States v. Brien (1980)
66 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77Q (§ 17 of the Securities Act of 1933)
Relies on Hagner v. United States · Rosen v. United States · Ex parte Jackson · Badders v. United States · Cochran v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It shall be unlawful for any person in the sale of any securities by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by the use of the mails, directly •or indirectly — (I) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud, or * * *.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Congress, under its power to establish post offices and post roads, Article I, Sec. 8, United States Constitution, has full control of the mails and may forbid their use in the execution of schemes to defraud.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““ ‘Offer for sale’ or ‘offer to sell’ shall mean every attempt or offer to dispose of, * * * a security or interest in a security for value. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.