United States v. Mathis’s Empirical Analysis
96 F.3d 1577 · 1996
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 2023
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2516 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2518 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 3162 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974)
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · United States v. Matlock · Illinois v. Rodriguez · Commissioner v. Engle · United Transportation Union v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Assuming without deciding that defendant presented a pri ma facie case of purposeful discrimination, we hold that the district court did not err in accepting the government’s race-neutral explanations and concluding that defendant had not carried his burden of proving purposeful discrimination.” (internal citations omitted)). 9 . See”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.