McCain v. Gramley’s Empirical Analysis
96 F.3d 288 · 1996
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently September 2010 · most notably Tankleff v. Da Senkowski (1998), Harris v. Kuhlmann (2003)
21 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Swain v. State of Alabama · Hernandez v. New York · Purkett v. Elem
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To survive a Batson challenge, unlike a challenge for cause, a peremptory strike need not be based on a strong or good reason, only founded on a reason other than race or gender. [In addition,] "unless a discriminatory intent is inherent in the [nonmovant's] explanation, the reason will be deemed race-neutral.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]here there are only a few members of a racial group on the venire panel and one party strikes each one of them,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a race-neutral explanation shifts the burden back to [the movant] to prove intentional discrimination”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.