United States v. Tisor’s Empirical Analysis
96 F.3d 370 · 1996
Citation profile
59 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 132 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably United States v. Hankey (2000), United States v. Fernandez (2004)
59 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 801 (§ 101 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 843 (§ 403 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Olano · United States v. Young · United States v. Lopez · Rauer v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 132 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is generally admissible unless the unintelligible portions are so substantial that the recording as a whole is untrustworthy.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is a commercial activity which substantially affects interstate commerce.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“affected the outcome of the district court proceeding.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.