United States v. Rivera’s Empirical Analysis
96 F.3d 41 · 1996
Citation profile
15 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2017
15 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act)
Relies on National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · Crisp v. Rubin · Colonial Village, Inc. v. Spann · Mitan v. United States · Tanner v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“will not be disturbed unless it is without foundation.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.