Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 F.3d 692 - Anthony v. Interform Corp.

Anthony v. Interform Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

96 F.3d 692 · 1996

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
January 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently January 2019

2 federal appellate ·

60199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 502

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Armstrong v. Manzo · Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency v. Faish · Faish v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency · United States v. Parson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If [an] objection to a claim is made, the court ... shall determine the amount of such claim as of the date of the filing of the petition, and shall allow such claim in such amount, except to the extent that— (7) if such claim is the claim of an employee for damages resulting from termination of an employment contract, such claim exceeds— (A) the compensation provided by such contract, without acceleration, for one year following the earlier of— (i) the date of the filing of the petition; or (ii) the date on which the employer directed the employee to terminate, or such employee terminated, performance under such contract; plus (B) any unpaid compensation due under such contract, without acceleration, on the earlier of such dates.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.