Dao v. Auchan Hypermarket’s Empirical Analysis
96 F.3d 787 · 1996
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably Taylor v. Books A Million, Inc. (2002), Evelyn Bonilla and Rafael Colon v. Muebles Jj Alvarez Inc (1999)
9 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12117 (§ 107 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Jackson v. City of Beaumont Police Department · Nilsen v. City of Moss Point · Mitchell v. McBryde · Stewart v. County of Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[section] 2000e-5(f)(1) provides that a civil action must be commenced 'within ninety days' after the charging party has received a 'right-to-sue' letter from the EEOC or state or local agency.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Vielma v. Eureka Co.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.