Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 F.3d 917 - Schweihs v. Burdick

Schweihs v. Burdick’s Empirical Analysis

96 F.3d 917 · 1996

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2013

2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

90199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Delaware v. New York · Sanders Confectionery Products Inc. v. Heller Financial, Inc. · 43 Ill. 2d 54 - Rozny v. Marnul · Allstate Insurance v. Maleski · 166 Ill. 2d 72 - Hermitage Corp. v. Contractors Adjustment Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`in situations where the defamatory material is published in a manner likely to be concealed from the plaintiff, such as credit reports or confidential memoranda'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.