Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

96 F. App'x 900

Frazer v. Taylor

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided May 18, 2004

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2004-05-18

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1447

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2004-05-18

PER CURIAM.

¶1 A. Corwin Taylor seeks to appeal the district court’s orders remanding the civil action against him to state court for lack of federal jurisdiction and denying his subsequent motion to vacate the remand order. The district court’s remand order is not renewable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2000). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Taylor’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED

/96/fappx/900 · .json · Public domain