Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

96 F. App'x 925

Brooks v. Harris

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided May 21, 2004

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2004-05-21

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2004-05-21

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Mary Brown Brooks appeals from the district court order granting the Government’s motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum issued by a state court upon a federal employee in his official capacity. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brooks v. Harris, No. CA-04-91 (E.D.Va. Apr. 7, 2004). We deny the motion to expedite the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED

/96/fappx/925 · .json · Public domain