Landy v. Amsterdam’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2003
3 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1104 (§ 404 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
Relies on Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States · Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp. · Lewis v. Curtis · Dorfman v. First Boston Corp. · Entin v. Barg
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.