Youngson v. Lusk’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 1992
4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Relies on Wuchter v. Pizzutti · Webb Packing Co. v. Harmon · Rose v. Gisi · 89 F. Supp. 429 - Helgeson v. Barz · 28 F. Supp. 983 - Boss v. Irvine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Additional Time After Service By Mail. Whenever a party has the right or is required to do some act or take some proceedings within the prescribed period after the service of a notice or other paper upon him and the notice or paper is served upon him by mail, 3 days shall be added to the prescribed period.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The flexibility of the quoted language allows its broad application to the varied practices of the several states, in some of which the process precedes, in others of which it follows, the filing of the petition, and some of which require, and others do not require, the formal service of the petition or a copy thereof on the defendant.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rodriguez v. Hearty““The petition for removal of a civil action or proceeding shall be filed within twenty days after the receipt by the defendant, through service or otherwise, of a copy of the initial pleading setting forth the claim for relief upon which such action or proceeding is based *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kurtz v. Harris
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.