96 F. Supp. 883 - Isbrandtsen Co. v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1989
8 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 22 U.S.C. § 1501 · 5 U.S.C. § 1006 · 5 U.S.C. § 1007 · 7 U.S.C. § 1622
Relies on Ala Schechter Poultry Corporation v. United States · United States v. Borden Co. · Fashion Originators' Guild of America, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission · United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc. · Federal Communications Commission v. Sanders Bros. Radio Station
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'The agency must always act upon the record made, and if that is not sufficient, it should see the record is supplemented before it acts.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““All agreements, modifications, or cancellations made after the organization of the commission [board] shall be lawful only when and as long as approved by the commission [board], and before approval or after disapproval it shall be unlawful to carry out in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, any such agreement, modification, or cancellation. “Every agreement, modification, or cancellation lawful under this section shall be excepted from the provision of [the anti-trust laws].” 21”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.