96 F. Supp. 2d 907 - Smith v. Babbitt’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 371 · 25 U.S.C. § 381 · 25 U.S.C. § 450 (§ 2 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1360 · 5 U.S.C. § 704 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Califano v. Sanders · Darby v. Cisneros · Lincoln v. Vigil · United States v. Cherokee Nation of Okla.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[F]inal agency action for which there is no other adequate remedy in a court . . . [is] subject to judicial review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.