State v. Aplaca’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Okada Trucking Co. v. Board of Water Supply (2002), State v. Kaua (2003)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Arizona v. Fulminante · Johnson v. United States · Neder v. United States · Fertel-Rust v. Dane County Social Services · State v. Kelekolio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We answer questions of constitutional law ‘by exercising our own independent judgment based on the facts of the case,’ ” and, thus, questions of constitutional law are reviewed on appeal “under the ‘right/wrong’ standard.” State v. Jenkins, 93 Hawai'i 87, 100 , 997 P.2d 13, 26 (2000) (citations omitted).”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"[F]actors which indicate a plain and manifest abuse of discretion are arbitrary or capricious action by the judge and a rigid refusal to consider the defendant's contentions." And, "[g]enerally, to constitute an abuse it must appear that the court clearly exceeded the bounds of reason or disregarded rules or principles of law or practice to the substantial detriment of a party litigant."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Kong. · State v. Heggland“[T]he interpretation of a statute ... is a question of law reviewable de novo.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.