Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 Ill. 2d 204 - People v. Stroner

96 Ill. 2d 204 - People v. Stroner’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2024

13 state decisions

13019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jones v. United States · 94 Ill. 2d 190 - People v. Wisslead · State v. Looney · United States v. Lord · United States v. Krol

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"ANTHONY DEL PERCIO committed the offense of ARMED VIOLENCE in that said defendant while armed with a Category I dangerous weapon, a sawed off shotgun, committed the offense of Attempt (Armed Robbery) in that said defendant with the intent to commit the offense of Armed Robbery in violation of Illinois Revised Statutes Chapter 28 [ sic ], Section 18-2, took a substantial step toward the commission of that offense in that said defendant, while armed with a dangerous weapon, a gun, and in the presence of Enrique Ortiz threatened the imminent use of force in that he knocked on the door of Apartment A of Enrique Ortiz, at 67 E. Blecke, Addison, Du Page County, Illinois, and pointed said shotgun at Enrique Ortiz * * *." (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"A person commits conspiracy when, with intent that an offense be committed, he agrees with another to the commission of that offense. No person may be convicted of conspiracy to commit an offense unless an act in furtherance of such agreement is alleged and proved to have been committed by him or by a co-conspirator." Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 38, par. 8-2(a).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[C]onspiracy requires an agreement to commit a specific crime and an overt act in furtherance of the agreement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.