96 Ill. App. 2d 225 - Davis v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““It is, however, well established that where the Administrative Review Act is expressly referred to in the Act conferring power on an administrative agency the prior equitable modes of review cannot be obtained. (People ex rel. Chicago and N. W. Railway v. Hullman, 21 Ill.2d 166 , 201 N.E.2d 103 ; People ex rel. Fike v. Slaughter, 31 Ill. App.2d 175 , 175 N.E.2d 585 ; Moline Tool Co. v. Dept. of Revenue, 419 Ill. 35 , 101 N.E.2d 71 .) Nor do we find equitable grounds for dispensing with the requirements of the act. The thirty-five day period within which plaintiff had to file his complaint in administrative review commenced not with the date of the decision but the date of his notification.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 131 Ill. App. 2d 264 - People Ex Rel. Peterson v. Valencik