Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 ILLAPP3D 187 - People v. Hale

People v. Hale’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 2020

5 state decisions

3019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · 58 Ill. 2d 187 - People v. Krantz · 7 Ill. App. 3d 800 - People v. Hudson · 82 Ill. App. 3d 596 - People v. Bennett · 10 Ill. App. 3d 558 - People v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “represented by counsel at the time the guilty plea was negotiated and accepted, reversible error would occur only if he can establish that he was actually unaware of the possible punishment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.