Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 IND 550 - Goodwin v. State

Goodwin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1883

Citation profile

120
cited by 120 later decisions
15
states following
April 1982
most recently cited

118 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 120 later decisions — most recently April 1982 · most notably Hinshaw v. State (1897), Hill v. State (1969)

118 state decisions — followed in 15 states

36018831890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Cronin · Keener v. State · Choice v. State · Bradley v. State · Cowley v. . People of the State of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 120 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Evidence is not to be considered in fragmentary parts and as though each fact or circumstance stood apart from the others, but the entire evidence is to be considered and the weight of testimony to be determined from the whole body of the evidence. A circumstance considered apart from the other evidence may be weak, if not improbable, but when viewed in connection with surrounding facts and circumstances may be so well supported as to remove all doubt as to its existence as detailed by the witness. Acts considered apart from all other evidence may appear innocent, but when considered with other evidence may import guilt.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . It would have been proper for the court to instruct the jury that evidence of the absence of motive was entitled to consideration upon the question of mental capacity, but we are inclined to the opinion that it would not have been, proper to characterize it as important evidence. . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.