96 Ind. App. 320 - Flinn v. Hartley’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 1976
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bimel Spoke & Wheel Co. v. Loper · Standard Cabinet Co. v. Landgrave · 96 Ind. App. 122 - Roush v. W. R. Duncan & Son · 85 Ind. App. 659 - Zeller v. Mesker · Consumers Co. v. Ceislik
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ (2) Section 60 of the Compensation Act, supra, provides that, upon review by the full Industrial Board, said board ‘shall review the evidence, or, if deemed advisable, hear the parties at issue, their representatives and witnesses. . . .’In interpreting the above quoted provision of the law this court has held that it is a matter within the sound discretion of the Board as to whether, upon the showing made, it will permit the introduction of further evidence, and its action in that regard is not subject to review by this court unless the record shows an abuse of this discretion. This, we think, is the correct construction to be placed on the law. See Riley v. Hunt et al. (1927), 85 Ind. App. 647 , 155 N. E. 528 ; Bimel Smoke, etc., Company v. Loper (1917), 65 Ind. App. 479 , 117 N. E. 527 ; Consumers’ Company v. Ceislik (1919), 69 Ind. App. 333 , 121 N. E. 832 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.