Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 KAN 278 - Miller v. Thayer

Miller v. Thayer’s Empirical Analysis

1915

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
July 1963
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 1963

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 12 state decisions

50191519201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Clement v. Field · Deford v. Hutchison · Gardner v. Risher · Greenawalt v. Wilson · Minneapolis Thrashing-machine Co. v. Currey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If for any reason the indebtedness evidenced by the note does not exist, the plaintiff is not entitled to the possession of the property in controversy under his chattel mortgage. Whatever defeats the note may be set up as a defense to defeat the plaintiff in this action. In order that the dispute concerning the transaction may be settled, it is necessary that the claims of both the plaintiff and the defendant be adjudicated. Both parties ask that the right to the possession of the property be determined. It is proper that this be done. This can not be done without determining the matters presented in the answer. There are no practical, insurmountable difficulties in the way of determining, in this action, all the rights of these parties growing out of the transaction which has become the subject of this lawsuit.” (p. 280.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.