¶1(concurring specially): While the consideration stated is sufficient to dispose of the case, I think that the information should also be treated as though it stated that the defendant in doing the things complained of was engaged in the practice of “chiropractic,” and that its effect, as so construed, should be determined.
96 Kan. 604
State v. Snodgrass
Decided November 6, 1915
Supreme Court of Kansas · decided 1915-11-06
<p>Appeal from Montgomery district court; Thomas J. Flannelly, judge.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1924
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Reversed · Decided 1915-11-06
View the full empirical analysis of this case →