96 Md. App. 22 - Manno v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

12 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “It is elemental to Fifth Amendment constitutional review that the overriding consideration is whether a statement is the product of the compulsive and coercive effect of deliberate efforts on the part of agents of the State to extract incriminating information against the will of the target of the investigation. In no sense can the actions of Officer Grumbach be considered the opening volley of a succession of coercive efforts on the part of the police to extract a statement from appellant. There indeed was no attempt on his part to wear down the will of appellant or to obtain a statement that was the product of intimidation, coercion, deception, or overborne will.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 175 Md. App. 90 - Costley v. State

2. “There was clearly evidence before the Circuit Court for Baltimore County that appellant did not indicate he wanted an attorney “until after the interview.” Under the Supreme Court’s decisions in Mosley and Edwards and our decision in Latimer , by no stretch can appellant’s statement that “I don’t want to talk about it” be interposed as a requirement that counsel be present before there could be any further interrogation.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 158 Md. App. 402 - Freeman v. State