96 Misc. 2d 481 - Gold v. Gold’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Children have always been objects of special concern to the courts, entitled to protection from exploitation even by their parents. Absent evidence of need, children should not be forced unwittingly to use their funds or diminish their assets to support themselves.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 339 Pa. Super. 523 - Sutliff v. Sutliff

2. “barred from using the children's funds for their support, since by reducing her child care obligations, she would receive an indirect financial advantage.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 258 N.J. Super. 24 - Cohen v. Cohen