Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

96 Miss. 456

Ross v. Simpson County

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1910

Mississippi Supreme Court · decided 1910-03-15

Ruom: the circuit court of Simpson county. .UoN. Robebt L. Bullard, Judge. ■James Ross and Edward Yerger, composing the partnership of Ross & Yerger, appellants, were plaintiffs in the court below, and Simpson county, appellee, was defendant there. From a judgment, predicated of a peremptory 'instruction in favor of defendant, the plaintiffs appealed to the supreme court.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1985

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1910-03-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mayes, J.,

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2An examination of this record leaves no doubt in our minds 'that the county of S-impson is liable to appellants for the amount of premiums due for insuring the courthouse property. Express authority is given to Bryan to do “all things necessary 'to preserve and complete the building at the earliest time possible.” This order of the board necessarily conferred upon him the power to insure this building, as it was in the highest •degree necessary to insure, in order to take proper precaution to preserve the building in compliance with the board’s order, .and it would almost have amounted to criminal negligence had Bryan failed to insure and the building been destroyed by fire. *461We do not deem it necessary to protract the discussion of tbis case, for it seems plain to us that, instead of a peremptory instruction against appellants, it- should have been given for them.

¶3Reversed and remanded.

/96/miss/456 · .json · Public domain