Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 MISS 503 - Parks v. Granger

Parks v. Granger’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
October 1982
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 1982

2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

4019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Almand v. Almand · Baxter v. Bates · Warder, Bushnell & Glessner Co. v. Raymond

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Attorney’s fees arising out of the contract on account of the failure of the maker to perform it, are incidental to it, and arise from the express agreement of the parties, and are as much a part of the controversy, or matter in dispute, as the debt itself. If the attorney’s fee was allowed by law it would then probably be held to be a part of the cost of the suit, and not a subject of dispute or controversy-”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In the event this note is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection, or suit is brought on the same, or costs are incurred in collecting same, or any portion thereof, or if collected by any court proceedings, we and each of us, jointly and severally [i.e., Gordon L. Duckworth], further agree to pay the owner or holder reasonable attorney’s fees and cost[s] of collection.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.