Frank v. Robinson & Holt’s Empirical Analysis
1887
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1889
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“evidence of a fraudulent intent, proper, with other facts attending the transaction, to be submitted to a jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Eigenbrun v. . Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.