Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 N.C. 28 - Frank v. Robinson & Holt

Frank v. Robinson & Holt’s Empirical Analysis

1887

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1889
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “evidence of a fraudulent intent, proper, with other facts attending the transaction, to be submitted to a jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.