Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 N.C. App. 359 - Adams v. Moore

96 N.C. App. 359 - Adams v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
7
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 140 N.C. App. 390 - Norman v. Nash Johnson & Sons' Farms, Inc. (2000), 152 N.C. App. 240 - Governor's Club, Inc. v. Governors Club Ltd. Partnership (2002)

42 state decisions

1901989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sutton v. Duke · Terry v. Terry · Abbitt v. . Gregory · 88 N.C. App. 437 - Robertson v. Boyd · Watts v. Cumberland County Hospital System, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[u]njust enrichment is a legal term characterizing the result or effect of a failure to make restitution of, or for, property or benefits received under such circumstances as to give rise to a legal or equitable obligation to. account therefor. It is a general principle, underlying various legal doctrines and remedies, that one person should not be permitted unjustly to enrich himself [or herself] at the expense of another. . . [.]”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.