Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 N.C. App. 589 - State v. Parks

96 N.C. App. 589 - State v. Parks’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably 109 N.C. App. 506 - Guyther v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance (1993), 128 N.C. App. 559 - State v. Jacobs (1998)

45 state decisions

2101989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. United Jersey · State v. Earnhardt · State v. Bullard · State v. Walker · State v. Etheridge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] finding by the trial judge that the witness possesses the requisite skill will not be reversed on appeal unless there is no evidence to support it.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]f scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto[.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[c]onstructive force in the form of fear, fright, or coercion [is sufficient] to establish the element of force in second-degree rape and may be demonstrated by proof of a defendant’s acts which, in the totality of the circumstances, create the reasonable inference that the purpose of such acts was to compel the victim’s submission to sexual intercourse.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.