Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 Nev. 435 - Dail v. State

Dail v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
9
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2018

1 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

901980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Baxter v. Palmigiano · 13 Cal. 3d 867 - People v. Coleman · United States v. Consuelo-Gonzalez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we decline to require that a criminal trial be conducted prior to a probation revocation hearing.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]e perceive no unconstitutional dilemma for the alleged violator who desires to defend himself or present mitigating 2Nothing in this opinion precludes the Legislature from enacting a statute that addresses the tension at issue. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 19474 a 5 evidence at a revocation proceeding. Appellant's predicament does not run afoul of constitutional due process.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “in some cases [the probationer] may profit by knowing the status of his sentence on the initial criminal charges so that if he is successfully prosecuted on the second charge the court. . . can consider imposing a concurrent or reduced sentence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.