Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 Nev. 791 - Kell v. State

Kell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2024

2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

8019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Levy & Zentner Co. v. Justice Court · A. B. Paul & Co. v. Beegan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “); NRS 62B.330 (providing that the juvenile court has exclusive original jurisdiction over a child alleged or adjudicated to have committed a delinquent act and listing acts deemed not to be delinquent and therefore not within the juvenile court's jurisdiction). However, Barber argues that the juvenile court lost jurisdiction and could not certify the case to the district court when it did not comply with NRS 62D.310. We disagree. Under NRS 62D.310(1),”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the juvenile court has exclusive original jurisdiction over a child living or found within the county who is alleged or adjudicated to have committed a delinquent act.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he juvenile court system is a creation of statute, and it possesses only the jurisdiction expressly provided for it in the statute.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.