Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 96 N.M. 359 - Hartman v. Shambaugh

Hartman v. Shambaugh’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
6
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 2022

4 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

6019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Safeco Insurance Co. of America Inc. v. McKenna · 116 Cal. App. 2d 113 - Overholtzer v. Northern Counties Title Insurance · Fohn v. Title Insurance Corp. of St. Louis · Kentucky Title Company v. Hail · Kidd v. . McCormick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It seems quite apparent to us that liability should be measured by diminution in the value of the property caused by the defect in the title as of the date of the discovery of the defect, measured by the use to which the property is then devoted. When a purchaser buys property and buys title insurance, he is buying protection against defects in title to the property. He is trying to protect himself then and for the future against loss if the title is defective. The policy necessarily looks to the future____ The insured, when he purchases the policy, does not then know that the title is defective. But later, after he has improved the property, he discovers the defect. Obviously, up to the face amount of the policy, he should be reimbursed for the loss he suffered in reliance on the policy, and that includes the diminution in value of the property as it then exists, in this ease with improvements. Any other rule would not give the insured the protection for which he bargained and for which he paid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) The liability of the Company under this policy shall in no case exceed the least of: (i) the actual loss of the insured claimant; or (ii) the amount of insurance stated in Schedule A.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.